JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) All the three petitions separately challenging the
order dated 20.03.2012, passed by the Additional Collector,
Sikar in three revision petitions whereby the Addl.
Collector has set aside patta Nos.23, 24, 25 issued to each
of the petitioners vide order dated 07.12.2009 by the Gram
Panchayat Sargoth, are being disposed of by this common
order.
(2.) The case of the petitioners is that they applied
for grant of patta of land situate north of Indira Colony in
Gram Panchayat Sargoth. It is submitted that their
applications were submitted on or about 01.05.2009.
According to the petitioners, the applications were
processed by the Gram Panchayat Sargoth and three
Panches were allegedly appointed under Rule 146 of the
Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 (hereinafter 'the
Rules of 1996') to inspect the site whereupon they did
inspect the site and submit their inspection report. It is
stated that the report of Patwari Halka was also asked for
and submitted along with evidence of two witnesses.
According to the petitioners, on the inspection made under
Rule 146 of the Rules of 1996, their possession of houses
allegedly existing on the land sought to be regularized was
found to exist. Consequent to the recommendation made,
land measuring 500, 699 & 504 sq. mtr. were allotted to
each of the petitioners respectively under patta Nos.23, 24
and 25 as purportedly no objection to the regularization of
the land in the names of the petitioners were received in
spite of notice. The case of the petitioners is that they were
issued patta aforesaid on 07.12.2009 in terms of Rule 157
of the Rules of 1996. The petitioners are stated to have
deposited the requisite charges as demanded by the
Panchayat. It is submitted that the land in respect of which
pattas were issued to the petitioners were registered with
the Sub-Registrar.
(3.) According to the petitioners, aggrieved of the
order dated 07.12.2009 passed by the Gram Panchayat
Sargoth issuing three pattas i.e. patta Nos.23, 24, & 25 to
the petitioners, the respondent Nos.2 & 3, Leechman and
Puran Mal laid revision petitions purportedly under Section
97 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (hereinafter
'the Act of 1994') challenging the regularization of land and
allotment of pattas in favour of the petitioners. It is
submitted that the Additional Collector, Sikar vide his order
dated 20.03.2012 without application of mind and
appreciation of facts on record has wrongly cancelled the
said allotment of pattas to the petitioners. Hence the writ
petitions.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.