JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This intra court appeal has been filed as against the
order of the Single Bench dated 14.3.2012 passed in S.B. Civil
Writ Petition No.12793/2011, whereby the Single Bench allowed
the writ petition filed by the respondent-petitioner and while
quashing the communication dated 25.11.2011 in so far relating
to respondent-petitioner directed the respondents to proceed
with the matter of appointment of the respondent petitioner
ignoring the registration of criminal case and if he is found
standing in the merit to offer him appointment within fifteen
days from the date of order.
(2.) Briefly stated the facts of the case are that in
pursuance of the advertisement dated 14.10.2010 (Annex.1)
issued by the appellants for recruitment to the different posts of
Constable which included Constable-General, ConstableOperator and Constable Driver etc., the respondent-petitioner
applied on or before 12.11.2010 under the ST category which
was the last date for submission of the application form. The
respondent-writ petitioner qualified in the written examination
and he was called for physical test. After selection process was
over, the appellants issued the select list wherein the petitioner's
name did appear therein at S.No. 76. However, when the writ
petitioner was not issued appointment, then on enquiry made
under the RTI Act, vide communication 25.11.2011 he was
informed that since the writ petitioner has concealed the fact
regarding challan having been filed against him in a criminal
case pending against him, he was not offered appointment.
Being dissatisfied with denial of appointment, the petitioner
preferred a writ petition.
(3.) The respondents did not file any return to the writ
petition.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.