AASHISH SHARMA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
LAWS(RAJ)-2012-1-245
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on January 06,2012

Aashish Sharma Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Mohammad Rafiq, J. - (1.) Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused material made available to me during course of arguments.
(2.) Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that petitioner is husband of deceased Alka, who took extreme step of committing suicide owing to certain dispute with the petitioner. The dispute was not of such a grave nature which would have justified taking extreme step of suicide. Allegations have been subsequently developed by father and brother of the deceased that the petitioner, his father and brother used to demand dowry. What was initially stated by Murari Lal, father of the deceased, is that demand of dowry was made for air-conditioner and repairing car, on the other hand it was also stated that a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- was given in dowry for purchase of car. In supplementary statement, however improvement was made by him stating that a swift d'zire car was demanded, whereas there was no independent evidence to that effect. The father, mother and brother of petitioner are also accused on similar allegation as would be evident from the statement of father Murari Lal, brother Atul Sharma, Balram Joshi and Shankar Lal. Challan has already been filed but even charges have not been framed so far. Petitioner is in jail from 13.04.2011. Trial may take a long.
(3.) Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.