GOVIND MATHUR Vs. MOHAN LAL
LAWS(RAJ)-2012-5-239
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on May 19,2012

Govind Mathur Appellant
VERSUS
Mohan Lal and Anr. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Dr. Vineet Kothari, J. - (1.) MR . R.R. Nagori, Sr. Advocate pleads no instructions. An application (IA No.6863/12) filed by the respondents under Order 22 Rule 3 (2) and Order 22 Rule 10A r/w Section 151 CPC for dismissal of the appeal as abated.
(2.) LEARNED counsel for the respondents submitted that since after the death of sole appellant -Govind Mahur, who is alleged to have expired on 16.09.2007, no steps have been taken for bringing his legal representatives on record, therefore, the present first appeal deserves to be abated. In support of the said application, affidavit of respondent No.1 Manohar Lal S/o Vardi Chand Suhalka has been filed. Since, the learned counsel for the appellant has pleaded no instructions, and nobody else has appeared to controvert these submissions of learned counsel for the respondents. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed as having abated. The application (IA No.6863/12) is accordingly allowed. No costs. A copy of this order be sent at the address of appellant -Govind Mahur and learned Court below forthwith.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.