URMILA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
LAWS(RAJ)-2012-9-250
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on September 05,2012

URMILA Appellant
VERSUS
The State of Rajasthan and Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Arun Mishra, C.J. - (1.) HEARD on the question of admission. There is delay of 135 days in filing the appeal.
(2.) FOR the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Application under Sec. 5 of the Limitation Act stands disposed of. Appellant has questioned the legality of the order dt. 10.01.2012 passed by the Single Bench, dismissing Civil Writ Petition No. 990/2003.
(3.) FACTS , in short, are that husband of appellant was given compassionate appointment on daily wages vide order dt. 15.09.1998; he died on 08.02.2001 after completion of less than three years of service; his widow applied for compassionate appointment, which was not offered on the ground that her husband was not in regular service of the State Government; he was simply a daily wage employee and as per definition of "Deceased Government servant", as provided under Rule 2(b) of the Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependants of Deceased Government Servant Rules, 1996(hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 1996'), the case was not covered. Rule 2(b) of the Rules of 1996 is quoted below: - 2(b). "Deceased Government servant" means a person who was employed in connection with the affairs of the State including a member of All India Services of Rajasthan State Cadre and whose pay was debitable to the consolidated fund of the State and who died while in service and who was: - (i) Permanent, or (ii) holding a post temporarily after appointment on regular basis, or (iii) appointed against a regular vacany on urgent/temporary appointment and had put in one year's continuous service as such;;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.