ASSTT COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER FLYING SQUAD Vs. KRISHNA OIL INDUSTRIES
LAWS(RAJ)-2012-8-85
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (AT: JAIPUR)
Decided on August 06,2012

ASSTT COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER FLYING SQUAD Appellant
VERSUS
KRISHNA OIL INDUSTRIES Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) This revision petition has been filed against the order dated April 9, 2003, passed by the Rajasthan Tax Board, Ajmer. The facts of the case are that the respondent-assessee purchased goods from M/s. Vimal Oil Industries, Kekri, through bill No. 420 dated July 18, 1996 for Rs. 3,54,005, against declaration ST 17 (D form) and transported the goods under bilty No. 109 dated July 18, 1996 from Kekri to Mania, District Dholpur. In the course of transportation, the goods were checked and the assessing officer found certain discrepancies including that the number of the declaration ST 17 was not mentioned in the bill (even though the declaration form was before the assessing officer) and that the DD number was not shown in the bill under which the goods were dispatched from the seller to the buyer (even though the bill recorded that part payment of the consideration was received through a demand draft). Based on the discrepancies in the documents as aforesaid, the assessing officer sought to verify the bill in issue from the regular bill book of the consignor and found that the third foil of the bill, which was earlier torn out from the bill book along with two other foils was pasted at the back of the bill book.
(2.) A show-cause notice was issued to the respondent-assessee to show why penalty not be imposed. In reply to the show-cause notice, the respondent-assessee furnished the number of declaration of ST 17 and sought to disabuse the assessing officer's mind owing to certain technical lacunae in the documents accompanying the goods in transit even though there was no evidence to doubt the genuineness of the transaction and transit of goods in pursuance thereof. The assessing officer however proceeded to levy a penalty of Rs. 70,800 under section 78(5) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994.
(3.) In appeal by the respondent-assessee, the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the order of penalty holding it to be based on mere suspicion and not on any positive finding of irregularity in the course of transit of goods in question. A further appeal by the petitioner also came to be dismissed by the Rajasthan Tax Board vide its order dated April 9, 2003.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.