URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST Vs. BOARD OF REVENUE FOR RAJASTHAN, AJMER & ORS
LAWS(RAJ)-2012-2-219
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on February 03,2012

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST Appellant
VERSUS
Board Of Revenue For Rajasthan, Ajmer And Ors Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) This petition has been filed against the order dated 23.03.2010, passed by the Board of Revenue, Ajmer, whereby the appeal filed by the private respondent Nos.2 to 5 was allowed and the order dated 20.10.2008, passed by the Revenue Appellate Authority (hereinafter 'RAA') set aside. The Board of Revenue by the impugned order has also been pleased to set aside the order dated 25.02.2004, passed by the Collector, Ajmer purporting to transfer land in Khasra No.3362 in the khatedari of respondent Nos.2 to 5 situated at Bhopo Ka Bada , Thok Maliyan-I, Tehsil and District Ajmer to the Urban Improvement Trust.
(2.) The facts of the case are that by the order dated 25.02.2004, the Collector, Ajmer in the exercise of power under Section 92 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 (hereinafter 'the Act of 1956') sought to set apart certain land including the land of the respondents to the Urban Improvement Trust for development of Abadi. Claiming to be Khatedars and thus aggrieved of the said order to the extent of land in issue, the respondent Nos.2 to 5 filed an appeal under Section 75 of the Act of 1956 before the RAA. Vide order dated 20.10.2008, the RAA negatived the case of the respondent Nos.2 to 5 and dismissed the appeal.
(3.) Aggrieved of the order dated 20.10.2008, passed by the RAA, the private respondent Nos.2 to 5 laid a further appeal before the Board of Revenue under Section 76 of the Act of 1956. On consideration of the matter, the Board of Revenue noted the fact that in respect of land ad measuring 13 Biswa and 10 Biswansi in Khasra No.3362 situated at Bhopo Ka Bada , Thok Maliyan-I, Tehsil and District Ajmer, the private respondent Nos.2 to 5 laid a suit No.4/1971 before the Sub Divisional Officer, Ajmer (hereinafter 'SDO') inter alia for declaration of their khatedari and mutation of their name in the revenue record whereupon vide order dated 11.12.1972, the SDO had issued a declaration that the respondent Nos.2 to 5 were the khatedars of the land ad measuring 13 Biswa and 10 Biswansi out of the total area of of land ad measuring 1 Bigha 2 Biswa 10 Biswansi in Khasra No.3362. The Board of Revenue also noted that the said order dated 11.12.1972 was never modified or set aside and this fact was admitted both by the State Government as also by the Urban Improvement Trust. In this view of the matter, the Board of Revenue allowed the appeal filed under Section 76 of the Act of 1956 by the private respondent setting aside both the order dated 20.10.2008, passed by the RAA as also the order dated 25.02.2004, passed by the Collector setting apart the land in the khatedari of private respondents under Section 92 of the Act of 1956 for development by the Urban Improvement Trust.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.