JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Today, this reference application is listed in default for
not filing extra set etc. and also for not sending notice to
unserved respondent (department). We requested the
departmental counsel Mr. V.K.Mathur to accept the notice
and assist the Court in deciding the reference, if possible.
We also requested Mr. Dinesh Mehta, learned counsel
appearing for the assessee to accept the notice on behalf of
the assessee because he usually appears for this assessee
to enable this Court to decide the reference.
(2.) By administrative orders of the Chief Justice passed on
25.07.2011, this reference application which was filed and
listed before Jaipur bench as Excise Act Reference
No.13/2003, was directed to be listed before Jodhpur
bench, because it was felt that it falls within the jurisdiction
of Jodhpur bench. This is how, this reference is listed
before this bench for passing appropriate order.
(3.) On perusal of statement of facts, we are at a lose to
understand as to under what circumstances and at whose
instance, this reference is made to this Court under Central
Excise and Salt Act of 1944. It, however, does indicate
that it must have been only at the instance of the assessee,
because it is sent by the Tribunal in an appeal filed by the
assessee which was dismissed being appeal
No.E/106/2001-NB (SM) by the Tribunal.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.