JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard learned counsel for the parties.
(2.) In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, the petitioner is claiming consideration of
her candidature for appointment on the post of Anganwari
Worker on the ground that she was selected and her name was
included in the select list at S.No.1 for Wart No.4, but without
any cause, respondent denied appointment to the petitioner,
therefore, she is seeking direction to the respondents to provide
appointment on the post of Anganwari Worker as per select list.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents
submits that the candidature of the petitioner was rejected on
the ground that the day on which petitioner filed an application
for appointment, she was pursuing STC course as regular
student and this fact was not disclosed by her, therefore,
appointment was not given to her.
(3.) Further, it is submitted that assurance has been
given to the petitioner that in the event of availability of vacancy
in future her candidature will be considered for appointment.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.