JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The petitioner has made a limited prayer that his
case should be considered for permanent parole by the
respondent as he claims to be eligible for the same.
(2.) However, the respondents are refusing to consider his
case ostensibly on the ground that he has been convicted
for offences under Sections 8/21(c) of NDPS Act and has
been sentenced to ten years of rigorous imprisonment.
(3.) Thus, he is ineligible for grant of permanent parole.
Despite the fact that the petitioner has
completed nine years, ten months and thirteen days,
despite the fact that he has already undergone his first
three paroles, the respondents are refusing to consider
him for permanent parole.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.