H V BHATIYA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
LAWS(RAJ)-2002-4-171
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on April 01,2002

H V Bhatiya Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) The Governor reserves to himself the right of withholding or withdrawing a pension or part thereof, whether permanently or for a specified period, and of ordering recovery from a pension of the whole or part of any pecuniary loss caused to the Government, if in any departmental or judicial proceedings, the pensioner is found guilty of grave misconduct or negligence during the period of his service including services rendered upon re-employment after retirement: Provided that the Rajasthan Public Service Commission shall be consulted before any final orders are passed: Provided further that where a part of pension is withheld or withdrawn, the amount of such pension shall not be reduced below the amount of rupees three hundred per mensem. 2(a)The departmental proceedings referred to in Sub-Rule (1), if instituted while the Government servant was in service whether before his retirement or during his re-employment, shall, after the final retirement of the Government servant, be deemed to be proceedings under this rule and shall be continued and concluded by the authority by which they were commenced in the same manner as if the Government servant had continued in service. Provided that where the departmental proceedings are instituted by an authority subordinate to the Governor, that authority shall submit a report recording its findings to the Governor. (b) The departmental proceedings, if not instituted while the Government servant was in service, whether before his retirement, or during his re-employment (i) shall not be instituted save with the sanction of the Governor, (ii) shall not be in respect of any event which took place more than four years before such institution, and (iii) shall be conducted by such authority and in such place as the Governor may direct and in accordance with the procedure applicable to departmental proceedings in which an order of dismissal from service could be made in relation to the Government servant during his service. (3) No judicial proceedings, if not instituted while the Government was in service, whether before his retirement or during his re-employment shall be instituted in respect of a cause of action which arose, or in respect of an event which took place, more than four years before such institution. (4) In the case of Government servant who has retired on attaining the age of superannuation or otherwise and against whom any departmental or judicial proceedings are instituted or where departmental proceedings are continued under Sub-Rule (2), a provisional pension as provided in Rule 90 shall be sanctioned. (5) Where the Governor decides not to withhold or withdraw pension but orders recovery of pecuniary loss from pension, the recovery shall not ordinarily be made at a rate exceding one third of the pension admissible on the date of retirement of a Government servant. (6) For the purose of this rule, (a) departmental proceedings shall be deemed to be instituted on the date on which the charges together with a statement of allegations on which they are based, or the proposal of Government to take disciplinary action together with the allegations on which it is proposed to be taken, are issued to the Government servant or pensioner, or if the Government servant has been placed under suspension from an earlier date, on such date; and (b) Judicial proceedings shall be deemed to be instituted (i) in the case of criminal proceeding, on the date on which the complaint or report of a police officer, of which the Magistrate takes cognizance, is made, and (ii) in the case of civil proceedings on the date the plaint is presented in the Court.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.