JUDGEMENT
S.K.KESHOTE, J. -
(1.) THE Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur, made this reference under S. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961,
thereunder, two questions, reproduced below, have been referred for the Court's opinion at the
instance of the assessee :
"In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, was the Tribunal right in holding that granting an interest-free advance by the assessee-company to the lessor, the assessee and director of the assessee-company, constituted a perquisite and therefore, interest calculated at market rate was an income under S. 2(24)(iv) of the Act ?" "Whether the Tribunal was right in not directing the AO to allow interest deemed as income under s. 2(24)(iv) of the Act as a deduction under S. 24(1)(vi) of the Act against income from house property when admittedly the impugned property was acquired with the amount of Rs. 5,50,000 advanced by the assessee free of interest ?"
(2.) LEARNED counsel for the parties are in agreement that the first question referred by the Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur, for this Court's opinion is squarely covered by the judgment of the apex Court
in the case of V.M. Salgaocar & Bros. vs. CIT (2000) 160 CTR (SC) 225 : (2000) 243 ITR 383 (SC),
in favour of the assessee.
Learned counsel for the parties are in further agreement that the second question referred for the opinion of the Court is consequential to question No. 1 and in case where, the question No. 1 is
decided in favour of the assessee against the Revenue, the second question becomes redundant.
(3.) HAVING gone through the statement of the case and the judgment of their Lordships of the apex Court in the case of V.M. Salgaocar & Bros. vs. CIT (supra), we are satisfied that the first question
referred for the opinion of this Court by the Tribunal stands concluded in favour of the assessee.
Accordingly, the question No. 1 is answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. As
a result of the opinion on question No. 1, the question No. 2 becomes redundant and thus no
necessity to give any opinion on this question.
This reference, accordingly disposed of. However, in the facts of this case no order as to costs.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.