S.K. BANSAL Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
LAWS(RAJ)-2002-11-46
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on November 01,2002

S.K. Bansal Appellant
VERSUS
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT Respondents

JUDGEMENT

M.R. Calla, J. - (1.) The petitioner joined the Rajasthan Judicial Service in the year 1976 and was promoted to R.H.J.S. in the year 1979. While he was serving as a member of the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service, the following adverse remarks for the years 1980, 1981 and 1982 were conveyed to him vide three separate communications dated 13.6.1986. For the year 1980 "He must improve his relations with the staff and judicial officers, He is more interested in deciding criminal cases. He should improve the image." For the year 1981 "Should improve his relations with the staff and brother officers. Quality of his judgments needs improvement." For the year 1982 "Does not keep good relations with his staff and the members of the Bar. His knowledge of law and the quality of his judgments need improvement. He does not enjoy sound reputation."
(2.) Against the adverse remarks for all these three years, the petitioner submitted a joint representation and this representation was rejected by a common order in the year 1988/1989. Subsequently, the joint review petition dated 22.10.1998 was submitted and that too, was rejected by a common order dated 30.11.99. Against rejection of his representation as above, the petitioner preferred this writ petition on 18.4.2000. When the petition came up before the court, notice was issued to the respondent on 28.4.2000 and on 14.7.2000 while granting time to the respondents for filling reply, the court passed order to fix this matter for final hearing.
(3.) The prayers as made by the petitioner in the present writ petition are as under: (a) The respondent may kindly be called upon to produce the entire record pertaining to the case; (b) The adverse entries made in the A.P.A.Rs. of the petitioner pertaining to the year 1980, 1981 and 1982 may kindly be quashed and expunged. (c) The respondent High Court may kindly be directed to award all consequential benefits to the petitioner. (d) The respondent may kindly be restrained from taking into consideration the said adverse entries against the petitioner in any manner whatsoever; (e) Cost of the writ petition may also kindly be awarded to the petitioner. (f) Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which may be considered just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly also be issued in favour of the Petitioner.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.