STONEWARE PIPE AND SANITARY FITTING MANUFACTURING CO Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
LAWS(RAJ)-1971-9-3
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on September 24,1971

STONEWARE PIPE AND SANITARY FITTING MANUFACTURING CO Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) PLAINTIFF Messrs Stoneware Pipe and Sanitary Fittings Manufacturing Company limited- Jaipur, was under members' voluntary wind-ing-up. Shri Ram Gopal chokhani was appointed. Its liquidator, but he obtained an order on July, 9. 1964 for the appointment of the Official Liquidator to be the liquidator, and for supervision by Court. The plaintiff has stated that Messrs Madanlal Kishore Sineh of Kishangarh obtained the permission of the former Jaipur State on January 17, 1946 for establishing a factory for the manufacture of stoneware pipes and other sanitary fittings in Jaipur. They and some others promoted a public com-pany under the name and style of M/s. Stone Ware Pipes and Sanitary Fittings manufacturing Company Limited, and it was incorporated on March 16, 1946, under the Jaipur Companies Act. The permission and the rights and concessions etc-granted to M/s. Madanlal Kishore Singh were transferred to the Company, which appointed M/s. Madanlal Kishore Singh as its managing agents.
(2.) THE managing agents pursued their efforts to obtain allotment of a plot of land to the Company, in the industrial area, for the setting up of the Company's factory. Plot No. 3, which is the suit plot, was allotted for the purpose. The managing agents then addressed letter Ex. 3 dated April 25, 1946 to the Director of Industries and Commerce for delivery of possession of the plot. The Director conveyed the sanction for the sale of that plot measuring 450 ft. x 483 ft. for the establishment of a factory, at the rate of annas 4 per square yard. A sum of Rs. 6. 414/13/6 was accordingly deposited by the plaintiff against cash receipt Ex. 5 dated September 6, 1947. Possession of the plot was given to the plaintiff and it provided a wire fencing where necessary. The plaintiff has contended that it then became the full owner, in possession, of the suit plot.
(3.) THE plaintiff has stated further that it constructed roads, buildings, sheds etc. In and over the suit plot, installed machinery and other equipment at a cost of about rs. 58. 956/4/- and started the production. Its grievance is that although it was the owner in possession of the suit plot, the Urban Improvement Trust, defendant no. 2, illegally and forcibly occupied an area measuring 340 ft. x 483 ft. (18246 2/3 square yards) in May, 1958. That area has been marked ABFE in site-plan Ex. 8. while the entire area purchased by the plaintiff has been marked ABCD in that plan. Shri Ram-pal Singh, who was a share-holder and ex-director of the company, held a discussion with the Organizer. Industrial Estates, Industries and supplies department, in that connection, and the Organizer sent him reply Ex. 9 dated January 3, 1959 enquiring about his expectation of the price for the total area, excluding the area enclosed by the factory. While these efforts to recover the land were going on, an extraordinary meeting of the members of the Company was held on August 31, 1961 in which the aforesaid decision was taken to wind it up voluntarily and to appoint Shri Ram Gopal Chokhani as the liqui-dator. Shri chokhani found letter Ex. 11 of April 1962, pasted on the factory premises stating that as the plaintiff was under liquidation and had not fulfilled the conditions on which the land was allotted, and there was no chance of the land being utilised for the purpose for which it was allotted, it stood forfeited and its possession resumed by the Government with effect from the date of the order. Shri Chokhani lodged a protest under letter Ex. 12 dated April 23. 1962, but did not receive a reply. The plaintiff then gave a notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure, on june 30. 1962.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.