NISHA @ ARPITA Vs. DEEPAK GOYAL
LAWS(RAJ)-2021-4-35
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on April 06,2021

Nisha @ Arpita Appellant
VERSUS
DEEPAK GOYAL Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg,J. - (1.) The instant criminal misc. petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. have been filed against the order dated 16.12.2020 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Bhilwara in Criminal Misc. Case No.169/2018 whereby the learned Judge allowed the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of Smt.Nisha @ Arpita and her minor son Daksh Goyal. The husband of Smt.Nisha, namely, Deepak Goyal was directed to pay a sum of Rs.6,000/- per month to minor son Daksh through his mother Smt.Nisha @ Arpita as interim maintenance.
(2.) Learned counsel appearing for Deepak Goyal submits that Smt. Nisha @ Arpita did not produce any document to substantiate her allegations. The court below has committed illegality in allowing the application filed on behalf of Smt. Nisha & Daksh. Further, the amount of interim maintenance awarded by the Family Court is on higher side as the husband is not in a position to pay the said amount of interim maintenance to her wife and minor son, therefore the same may be reduced.
(3.) I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the order impugned as also other material available on record.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.