MANOJ KUMAR VYAS,J. - (1.) These writ petitions have been filed against the order dated 18.04.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal Bench at Jaipur, whereby the T.A.(Transferred Application) No. 19/2011, T.A.(Transferred Application) No. 18/2011 and O.A. (Original Application) No. 162/2012, were dismissed.
(2.) These three cases involved the same parties and similar issues relating to expunging of adverse remarks in Annual Performance Appraisal Report / Annual Confidential Reports, (APAR / ACRs) of the applicant-petitioner for the years 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05 respectively.
(3.) It was the case of the petitioner that adverse remarks were made in the APAR / ACRs of the petitioner for the reporting years in question. The adverse remarks in question were as under:- "TA No.19/2011:- Task Relevant Knowledge "Task related knowledge is not adequate and he does not keep himself updated with latest instructions, though he has potential to do so." Quality of output "He did not sort out the problems amicably and his tendency is to put blame on others. This resulted non-execution of various works in time and some of the works could not be started." TA No.18/2011:- Task Relevant Knowledge "The officer has satisfactory knowledge of functions and related instructions but lacks application." Quality of output "The officer can provide quality performance but lacks in output due to his negative approach and poor support base from his subordinates, colleagues and other agencies involved in the system. The adversely effects his standard of work, objectives and excellence in his work." JUDGEMENT_61_LAWS(RAJ)4_2021_1.html General assessment: "He does not obey to his seniors and there is no effect to counselling on him". Any adverse remarks including penalties imposed or warnings/displeasures communicated: "He was issued displeasure letters on 09.12.03, 23.12.03 and 24.12.03. OA No.162/2012:- Quality of output "Good" Attributes: General assessment: "Under given circumstances his performance has been satisfactory. He uses Rajbhasa for most of his work". Remarks of the Reviewing Authority: "An average officer who has a potential to do better".";