JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This regular first appeal has been filed against the
judgement and decree passed by the Additional District
and Sessions Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur dated 26.3.1992 in
a suit for eviction filed by the plaintiff-respondent. The
suit was filed on the ground of default. It was pleaded that
the defendant has committed default in making payment
of rent for more than six months starting from 1.1.1981,
before the filing of the suit. The trial court on 8.5.1978
passed the order of provisional determination of rent
u/s.13(3) of the Act. The arrears of rent to the tune of
Rs.96,500,19/- was ordered to be deposited, which
amount was deposited by the defendant. However, for the
subsequent period, it has been held by the trial court on
issue no.3 that the plaintiff-defendant further committed
default in making payment of rent for the month of
October, 1990. The decree of eviction was passed with
direction to the defendant to pay to the plaintiffrespondent a sum of Rs.12,502.82 towards electricity and
water charges.
(2.) Shri Alok Garg, learned counsel for the appellant has
argued that in so far as previous period of default of
defendant is concerned, non-payment of rent was owing
to the fact that there was a restraint order by the
Commercial Taxes Officer, Circle-E dated 4.2.1980 under
Section 11A of Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 requiring
the defendant not to pay the amount of rent to the
plaintiff. The said order was withdrawn on 25.9.1982.
(3.) Thereafter the defendant sent to the plaintiff a cheque
dated 15.10.1982 of Rs.51,119,32/- by registered A.D.
Post towards all the arrears, which was received by him
on 22.10.1982. It was argued that the matter on behalf of
defendant-appellant Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. was
not diligently conducted. Despite grant of several
opportunities, the Officer in charge has acted negligently
and therefore all these facts could not be proved by lead
of evidence. In fact, no evidence was led on behalf of
defendant and it was in the absence of evidence that the
suit was decreed against the defendant-appellant.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.