JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This habeas corpus petition has been filed by
the petitioner with the prayer that direction be issued
to the non-petitioners to produce the detenu, i.e. the
daughter of the petitioner before this court as she has
been illegally detained by respondents No. 5 and 6.
(2.) According to the petitioner, while she is living in
Hindaun City with her family, the respondents No. 5
and 6 are also living there on rent. On 12.12.2010,
when the petitioner had returned from a temple she did
not find her daughter Mamta at the residence. Her
niece Hema informed that Vishvendra and
Pushpendra , respondents No. 5 and 6, respectively,
had taken away Mamta at about 12 O'clock and since
then she has not come back. The petitioner is said to
have tried her best to search her daughter but could
not succeed. Subsequently, a report is said to have
been lodged before the police but no action was
taken. Deputy Superintendent of police Hindaun City
was also given a complaint by the petitioner on
27.1.2011 with regard to kidnapping of her daughter
by respondents No. 5 and 6 but no steps were taken
on the same. The complaint is also said to have been
given to the Superintendent of Police, District Karauli
with regard to the said subject matter but no action
have been taken. The petitioner had once again
submitted the complaint to the Dy. S.P. On 1.2.2011.
(3.) It is also the case of the petitioner that later on,
in the night of 31.1.2011, the fathers of the
respondents No. 5 and 6 had come to her residence
and gave threatening and asked to withdraw the
cases lodged by her. Thereafter, the petitioner is said
to have submitted a complaint u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C in
the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Hindaun City in respect of incident which had
occurred subsequently, in the night of 31.1.2011.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.