JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) In this miscellaneous appeal filed under Order 43
Rule 1, read with Section 104, C.P.C., appellants have
prayed for quashing order dated 20.05.2011 passed by the
Addl. District Judge (Fast Track) No.2, Udaipur upon
application filed under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2, read with
Section 151, C.P.C. in the suit for permanent injunction.
Learned trial Court accepted the application filed for
interim injunction by the plaintiff-respondent No.1 and
passed an order to maintain status quo till disposal of the
suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent No.1 for permanent
injunction.
(2.) Admittedly, the suit for permanent injunction and
partition of land in question was filed against the appellant
and defendant-respondents No.2 & 3 by the plaintiffrespondent No.1, in which, it is stated that defendant No.1
and plaintiff are real brother and sister and their father
Anoplal received property from his father late Kalu Lalji
situated in Araji No.1673 measuring 1.8500 hectare of
Patwar Circle Savina Tehsil Girwa.
(3.) After death of Anoplal, the plaintiff and respondent
No.2 became owner of the property in question, in which,
their share is 1/15 1/15 each. The case of the
respondent-plaintiff is that her father Anoplal became blind
10 years before his death and he was not understanding
anything, therefore, no will was executed by him; but,
defendant No.1 who is her real brother prepared a false
will upon which property in question was mutated and sold
to Ms/ Kamal Complex Pvt. Ltd.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.