JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Since common controversy being
involved in a bunch of instant petitions,
hence are heard together at joint request and
decided by this order.
(2.) Basic question raised by petitioners
for determination by this Court is as to
whether such applicants having not submitted
their applications pursuant to advertisement
issued by Rajasthan Public Service Commission
("RPSC") and regardless to their eligibility
but on being participated in a combined
competitive examination held for the posts of
Physical Training Instructor ("PTI") Gr.II
(Code-35) & Gr.III (Code-36), can be selected
and be recommended by PSC for appointment
under the Rajasthan Educational Subordinate
Service Rules, 1971 ("Rules, 1971").
(3.) Advertisement dt.03/09/2008 (Ann.1-
CWP-15289/2010) was issued by the RPSC for
holding process of selection for the posts of
PTI Gr.II & Gr.III under the Scheme of Rules,
1971. Under advertisement (supra), posts of
PTI Gr.II & Gr.III were separately identified
and a special Note was appended thereto that
applicants in OMR form have to specifically
mention in regard to their participation
either for PTI Gr.II (Code-35) or PTI Gr.III
(Code-36) or both separately. While submitting
OMR Form. Since there being different
qualification prescribed for PTI Gr.II &
Gr.III, one might have fulfilled requisite
qualification for both the posts, and may like
to appear in combined competitive examination
for both the posts.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.