VINEET KOTHARI - (1.) HEARD learned counsels.
(2.) The petitioner assessee has challenged the show cause notice Annex.3 dated 8/11/2004 for Assessment Year 2001 -02 by which the respondent Assessing Authority - Assistant Commissioner, Anti Evasion, Commercial Taxes Department, Bikaner gave a show cause notice to the petitioner assessee that the value of goods imported from out of the State, namely; Tea, against Form ST 18A was not correctly recorded in the Books of Accounts and the value of insurance premium paid was also to be treated as purchase value of such goods imported against From 'F' prescribed under the Central Sales Tax (Registration & Turnover) Rules, 1957 & why such difference may not be taxed in the hands of present petitioner assessee. The petitioner assessee filed preliminary reply to the said notice vide Annex.4 dated 15/12/2004 and Annex.5 dated 5/1/2005 and the only request made to the Assessing Authority was to supply the reasons, adverse material to the petitioner and also allow inspection of the record available with the Assessing Authority so that assessee could file appropriate reply in the matter. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that when nothing was done, the petitioner assessee was constrained to approach this Court by way of present writ petition. Reply to the writ petition has also been filed by the respondent Department in which the preliminary objection as to maintainability of the writ petition has also been raised.
(3.) AS far as non -supply of reasons and adverse material and not allowing inspection of record is concerned, learned counsel for the Revenue fairly submits that same would be supplied to the petitioner assessee.;