JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Aggrieved by the order dated 19.05.2007,
passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Udaipur,
whereby the learned Judge has dismissed the petitioner's
application under Section 127(3) Cr.P.C., the petitioner has
approached this Court.
(2.) The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner
and the respondent were married. However, subsequently
they were divorced. Initially, Smt Sunita had filed an
application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for seeking
maintenance from the petitioner. The said application was
accepted and the petitioner was directed to pay a
maintenance of Rs.600/- per month to Sunita.
(3.) Subsequently, the petitioner filed an application under
Section 127(3) Cr.P.C. ostensibly on the ground that Sunita
has married one Ratan Kumar. Therefore, the petitioner
need not maintain her any longer. In order to buttress this
case, the petitioner had submitted not only his own
affidavit, but also the affidavit of other persons. However,
vide order dated 19.05.2007, the learned Judge has
dismissed the said application. Hence, this petition before
this Court.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.