JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The petitioner-husband is aggrieved by the order
dated 28.07.2009, passed by the learned Judge, Family Court,
Udaipur, whereby the learned Judge has directed the petitionerhusband to pay a maintenance of Rs.1,500/- per month to the
respondent-wife and Rs.500/-per month each for respondent
Nos.3, 4 and 5, the three children born out of the wedlock.
(2.) Mr. J.V.S. Deora, the learned counsel for the
petitioner, has vehemently contended that according to the
respondent-wife herself, she has admitted, in her crossexamination, that the house in which she is staying with her
three children was built by her father and a portion of the said
house is on rent. Thus, she is deriving rental income. The said
rental income is sufficient for her to maintain herself and the
three children. Moreover, the petitioner-husband has already
filed an application under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act
for restitution of conjugal rights. Since he is willing to keep her
and the children with him, they are disentitled from claiming
any maintenance from him. Lastly, although no evidence with
regard to the income of the petitioner-husband was submitted
by the respondent-wife, still the learned Judge has directed the
petitioner to pay a total maintenance of Rs.3,000/- per month to
the respondents.
(3.) On the other hand, Mr. U.S. Gehlot, the learned
counsel for the respondent-wife, has strenuously contended that
according to the respondent-wife, the portion of the house which
is on rent, the rent amount is merely Rs.100/- per month. The
said amount cannot be held to be sufficient for maintaining lives
of four persons. Moreover, the learned Judge has rightly
concluded that the respondent-wife was subjected to mental and
physical currently. In fact, a criminal case has already been filed
by the respondent-wife against the petitioner-husband, which is
presently pending before the Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate No.3, Udaipur. Hence, she has sufficient reasons for
not wanting to live with the petitioner-husband. Lastly, the
respondent-wife is faced with the prospects of having to feed
herself and to feed her three children and to look after their
eduction and upbringing. Considering the high rate of inflation,
a total maintenance of Rs.3,000/- per month is not a bonanza.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.