JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard learned counsel for the
parties.
(2.) Hon'ble the Chief Justice has
constituted this Bench to answer the
following question referred by the learned
Single Judge:-
Whether under the provisions
of Protection of Women from
Domestic Violence Act, 2005,
complaint can be maintained
against female ignoring the
definition of respondent as
given under Section 2(q) of the
Act of 2005.
(3.) Briefly stated the facts of the case
are that Complainant/Respondent No.2 Smt.
Sagir Bano filed a complaint under Sections
12, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23(2) of the
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence
Act, 2005 (for short 'the Act of 2005') in
the Court of Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate No.4, Kota against six accused
persons, wherein petitioner Smt. Kaniz Fatima
was impleaded as accused No.3. Petitioner
filed an application before the trial Court
on 22.01.2008 to delete her name on the
ground that no complaint under the provisions
of the Act of 2005 can be filed against
female as female does not fall within the
meaning of respondent as defined under
Section 2(q) of the Act.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.