JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This order governs the disposal of
bail cancellation application filed under
Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C. by the petitioner
Hawa Singh seeking cancellation of bail of
the respondent no.2 Manish Kumar who has
been granted bail vide order dated 24
th
June,
2010 rendered by the learned Additional
Sessions Judge, Khetari.
(2.) Heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner, learned counsel for the
respondent as also learned Public Prosecutor
appearing for the State and perused the
relevant provisions of law as also relevant
material available on record.
(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner
has craved the cancellation of bail on the
ground of misrepresentation of the facts
having placed by the learned counsel for the
accused respondent before the Sessions court
when the bail application was argued.2
Learned counsel contended that the learned
trial court granted bail to the accused
respondent no. 2 Manish Kumar on wrong facts
and circumstances. The trial court ought to
have considered the bail of the accused
respondent only after the statements having
been recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C.
The accused respondent has been posing
threats to them and there is every
likelihood that the accused may tamper the
witnesses during trial, hence, the bail
granted to the respondent deserves to be
cancelled.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.