JARNAIL KAUR THROUGH HER LRS. CHAND SINGH & ORS. Vs. ASHOK KUMAR @ KAMAL
LAWS(RAJ)-2011-8-168
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on August 23,2011

Jarnail Kaur Through Her Lrs. Chand Singh And Ors. Appellant
VERSUS
Ashok Kumar @ Kamal Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Kailash Chandra Joshi, J. - (1.) This appeal has been filed by appellant Jarnail Kaur wife of Shri Chand Singh , r/o Ghuduwala ,Tehsil Padampur, District Sriganganagar, who died on 28.11.2003 and her LRS. namely- 1. Chand Singh, 2. Kuldeep Singh, 3 Daljeet Singh and 4. Hardeep Kaur have been brought on record against the respondent Ashok Kumar @ Kamal, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the learned Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Srigangangar dated 21.09.1984 in Civil Original Suit No.01/1979 by which the learned trial court dismissed the suit of the appellant filed for specific performance of the contract.
(2.) The short facts giving rise to this appeal are that the mother of the present appellant filed a suit for specific performance of the agreement dated 05.07.1975 by which the defendant (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondent') entered into an agreement for selling his land bearing murraba No.41 having 12 -1/2 bighas of land in lieu of Rs. 30,000/- and the plaintiff appellant paid Rs.24,000/- in cash and the respondent handed over the possession of the suit property to the appellant . On 04.09.1975, plaintiff paid Rs.1500/- to the respondent. The defendant inspite of several reminders, did not execute the sale deed and appellant was always willing and ready to pay the rest of the amount. Therefore, the appellant has filed a suit for specific performance of the agreement dated 05.07.1975 and further for injunction against the eviction from the suit property and in the alternative the appellant prayed for decreeing the suit for Rs.30,000/-.
(3.) The respondent filed a written statement and denied the fact of the execution of the agreement and further took a specific plea that the respondent belongs to Scheduled Caste and the appellant belongs to General Caste , therefore, the agreement is void in terms of the provisions of the Tenancy Act. He also took certain other pleas regarding the deficiency of the court fees. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties , the learned trial court on 03.08.1981 framed nine issues and later on vide order dated 19.04.1981 framed the following 14 issues: ...[VERNACULAR TEXT OMITTED]...;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.