GOKUL NARAYAN Vs. URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST
LAWS(RAJ)-1990-11-52
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on November 20,1990

Gokul Narayan Appellant
VERSUS
URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST Respondents

JUDGEMENT

K.C.AGRAWAL,C.J. - (1.) THIS revision has been preferred by Gokul Narayan Arora, whose land was acquired under the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Trust Act, 1959 for construction of a road by means of a notification Under Section 52(1) of the said Act issued on 12 -8 -1965 The possession of the land was taken by the State Government on 22nd June 1965. Proceeding for determination of compensation was thereafter initiated Under Section 53 of the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Trust Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). On 30th June 1976, the Additional Collector, Jodhpur determined the market value of the land at Rs. 67,276.82 and for the house which was standing on the land acquired at Rs. 3423.00. The Addl. Collector Jodhpur also held that interest would be payable on the quantum of compensation determined w.e.f. 22nd June 1965, i.e., the date of vesting of the property in the State of Rajasthan till the date of payment.
(2.) AGAINST this judgment of the Addl. Collector, two appeals were filed -one by the State and the other by the claimant -Gokul Narayan. On 27 -1 -1978, the compensation was raised by Rs. 2 per sq. ft. The petitioner thereafter filed a revision in the High Court, which was allowed and the case was remanded with the direction that the compensation be determined afresh. Upon redetermination, the petitioner was awarded compensation at the rate of Rs. 11.50 per sq. ft. He was still not satisfied, therefore, he filed revision no. 158 of 1986 in this court. In the revision, this court considered the effect of Rajasthan Urban Improvement (Amendment) Ordinance, 1987. In this ordinace, Section 60 -A was inserted in the principal Act which makes transitory provisions for pending matters relaing to acquisition of land. Sub -sections (2) and (6) of Section 60 -A are as under: (2) the amount of compensation or interest or that payable for any other reason shall in a matter pending on the date of commencement, be payable under and in accordance with the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act and the money paid prior to the date of commencement shall be deducted from or adjusted against the said amount. (6) An appeal filed Under Section 54 or Section 56 or a dispute referred Under Section 55 or Section 59 and pending on the date of commencement shall be decided having regard to the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act.
(3.) THE revision was allowed and the District Judge was directed to decide the appeal in accordance with the principal laid down in Bhag Singh v. Union Territory of Chandigarh : AIR1985SC1576 .;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.