JUDGEMENT
SOBHAGMAL JAIN, J. -
(1.) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment
dated Oct, 6, 1987, of the Sessions Judge Churu, convicting and
sentencing the appellant for the offence under Section 376, I.P.C. to 10
years R.I. and a fine of Rs, 250/and in default of payment of fine to 1
months further R.I. and under Section 447, I.P.C. to one months R.I. Both
the sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.
(2.) THE factual aspect of the prosecution case stands established by the evidence of Geeta the victim of the incident she was a minor girl.
Her evidence clearly shows that the accused committed rape upon her in
Likhma Ram's field in village Phandoro. Her evidence is corroborated by
the statements of Bhanwarlal, Nihala Ram who reached the spot on hearing
her cries. They reached the spot when the accused was lying on the girl
and committing rape upon her and it was on their arrival that the accused
fled away. The statement of Geeta is also corroborated by the evidence of
Dr. (Smt.) Jaishree Sharma who medically examined her and found that she
had been the victim of rape. The learned Sessions Judge has recorded the
finding that it was the accused who committed rape with Geeta. I do not
find any substantial grounds to up -set the said findings. The evidence of
Geeta is reliable and finds corroboration from other evidence on record.
The offences under Sections 376, I.P.C. and 447, I.P.C. are fully made
out against the accused.
As regards the question of sentence, I find force in the submissions made by Mr. Doongar Singh counsel for the accused. The
accused was a student. He was not a previous convict. He himself was aged
18 -20 years of age. The age of the girl according to Dr. Purshottam was about 12 years. In my opinion, there are special reasons, which justify
sentence less than 10 years to be awarded to the accused.
(3.) ACCORDINGLY , the appeal is partly allowed. The conviction of the accused under Sections 376 I.P.C. and 447, I.P.C. is maintained. His
sentence for the offence under Section 447, I.P.C. recorded by the
learned Sessions Judge is also maintained but his sentence under Section
376, I.P.C. is reduced to 7 years R.I. and a fine of Rs. 250/ - and in default of payment of fine to one year .R.I. Both the sentences shall run
concurrently.
Appeal partly Allowed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.