JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The only prayer made in this writ petition is that the learned
Industrial Tribunal has erred in passing the impugned order dated
10/3/2008 and while allowing the representation through lawyer in
the Industrial Tribunal to one of the workmen Om Prakash, learned
Tribunal has rejected the said prayer for the other two workmen
Bhanwar Lal and Bheru Lal even though common reference order
was made for all the three workmen as to whether their termination
w.e.f. 24/6/2006 was valid or not.
(2.) Having heard the learned counsels, it appears to this Court that
no cogent reason as been assigned in the order by the learned
Tribunal as to why representation through lawyer could not be
allowed to Bhanwar Lal & Bheru Lal, who are similarly situated to
workman - Om Prakash, who has been allowed such representation
and common reference has been made for the aforesaid dispute.
(3.) Under the provisions of Section 36(4) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947, the Learned Tribunal can grant such permission to be
represented through lawyer.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.