JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This intra-court appeal is directed against the order
dated 05.01.2009 whereby the learned Single Judge of this
Court has allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent
(CWP No. 3555/2008) and, while quashing the impugned
orders dated 01.02.2008 and 06.02.2008 relating to the
recovery from the respondent of the amount paid towards
retiral benefits, has directed the appellants to determine and
pay the pension and all other post retiral benefits to the
respondent by treating him a person retiring from the post of
Lineman under the Rajasthan Municipalities(Ministerial &
Subordinate Staff Service) Rules, 1963 [the Rules of 1963].
(2.) Briefly put, the relevant facts and backgrounds aspects
of the matters are that by an order dated 25.06.1967
(Annex.1), as issued by the Chairman, Municipal Board,
Suratgarh, the respondent (writ-petitioner) was given
appointment as Pump Driver on temporary basis in the pay
scale Rs.40-2-60 with admissible allowances including D.A. In
the year 1977, the writ-petitioner qualified the test for grant of
permit as Wireman and a permit was issued in his favour by
the competent authority. Thereafter, by the order dated
24.06.1981 (Annex.5), the Municipal Board proceeded to
convert the appointment of the writ-petitioner as Lineman from
the post of Pump Driver Grade-II; and such conversion was
regularised by the office order dated 06.09.2006 (Annex.5/A)
that was issued in compliance of the instructions given by the
Deputy Director, Local Self Department, Bikaner Region,
Bikaner on 11.07.2006. The writ-petitioner continued to serve
the appellants and ultimately, on attaining the age of
superannuation, he stood retired from service on 31.05.2007.It
is noticed from the amended orders dated 02.07.2007
(Annex.6) that the writ-petitioner was also allowed selection
grades on completion of 9, 18 and 27 years of service. It is
further borne out from the material placed on record that an
amount of Rs. 2,50,635/-was paid to the writ-petitioner on
31.05.2007 towards gratuity.
(3.) It appears that after his retirement, certain objections
were raised by the Directorate of Local Self Government
regarding grant of pension to the writ-petitioner on the ground
that he was not eligible to hold the post whether of Pump
Driver or of Lineman and, therefore, his initial appointment
itself was illegal. The Executive Officer, Municipal Board,
Suratgarh, in his communication dated 03.10.2007 (Annex.8)
made a request to the Director, Local Self Government, Jaipur
to grant relaxation to the writ-petitioner in educational
qualification and to regularise his appointment. However, for
no such relaxation having been accorded and for the
directions issued by the Deputy Director, Department of Local
Self Government, Bikaner Region, Bikaner, the Executive
Officer, Municipal Board, Suratgarh, by his order dated
01.02.2008 (Annex.13) proceeded to re-fix the pay of the writ-
petitioner and consequently issued another order dated
06.02.2008 (Annex.14) directing the writ-petitioner to deposit
an amount of Rs.1,16,985/-, said to have been paid in excess
towards gratuity, so that his pension case could be processed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.