JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Aggrieved vide order dated 25-10-2002, whereby the
Director Local Self Government had declared that the Screening
Committee did not find the Junior Engineers, working in Municipal
Boards eligible for regularisation, the petitioner has challenged the
said order before this Court.
(2.) The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner had done his
diploma in Civil Engineering from Polytechnic College, Ajmer. Initially,
the petitioner was appointed as Junior Engineer (Civil) in Municipal
Board, Jahajpur (Bhilwara) on daily wages basis on 28-6-1994. He
worked there till 31-5-1995. From 1-6-1995 till 31-8-1995, he worked
in Municipal Board Shahpura, District Bhilwara. Subsequently, he
was appointed on daily wages basis on 1-11-1995 in Municipal Board
Puskar. Thereafter, his services have been extended, from time to
time, by respondent No.2, the Municipal Board, Puskar. The post of
Junior Engineer (Civil) in Municipal Board, Puskar is a sanctioned
post.
(3.) Considering the fact that a large number of Junior Engineers
(Civil) were working in different Municipal Boards, throughout the
state, vide Circular dated 25-1-1998, the Director Local Bodies
invited applications from those Junior Engineers, who were working
on daily wages basis and had completed more than two years of
service as on 31-11-1997, and were still working. The applications
were invited for the purpose of screening such Junior Engineers and
for the regularisation of their services. Since, the petitioner was
eligible, his name was sent to the Screening Committee.
Subsequently, the Screening Committee called him for interview on
6-3-1998. After a lapse of four and a half years, vide order dated 25-
10-2002, the Screening Committee declared that out of 116
candidates, it found only three candidates eligible for regularisation.
Since, the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, he has knocked
on the doors of this Court.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.