JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This intra-court appeal is directed against the order dated
12.03.2010 whereby the learned Single Judge of this Court has
declined to entertain the writ petition (CWP No.2386/2010) filed by
the petitioner-appellant in challenge to the orders passed by the
State Government on 02.02.2010 (Annex.8 and Annex.9) granting
sanction for his prosecution in FIR Nos.279/2002 and 280/2002
registered by the Anti Corruption Bureau, Rajasthan, Jaipur for
offences under Sections 13(1) (c) (d) and 13 (2) of the Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988 and Sections 409, 420, 467, 471, 477A & 120B
of the Indian Penal Code; and placing him under suspension.
(2.) The petitioner-appellant filed the writ petition aforesaid with the
submissions that while posted as the Assistant Engineer, Water
Shed Development and Social Conservation, Pokaran in the year
1996-1997, his duties were to provide supervision and technical
guidance to the Junior Engineers undertaking various works in the
clusters falling under his jurisdiction but then, he was not entrusted
with any duty of preparing, verifying or sanctioning the bills prepared
by the Water Shed Committee; and he was simply entrusted the job
of forwarding the bills provided to him to the Project Implementation Agency.
(3.) While pointing out that the aforesaid FIRs bearing Nos.
279/2002 and 280/2002 were registered on the allegations that the
Users Committee practiced irregularities in the construction work and
obtained payment at inflated rates in excess to the work done and
his name was also included as an accused in the investigation; and
while referring to the orders for sanction of prosecution in relation to
the aforesaid FIRs as issued by the State Government on
02.02.2010 (Annex.8), the appellant raised the grievance that the
sanction had been issued in a mechanical manner and without
application of mind. The appellant asserted that verification of bills
was not his job at all nor he passed the bills; that the bills as
prepared by the Committee and verified by the Junior Engineer were
simply forwarded by him for necessary action; and that, in fact, he
was only a forwarding officer and nothing more.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.