JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) In this writ petition filed under Article 226
and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is
challenging the validity of judgment dated 30th January,
2002 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal
Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur in Original Application
No.53/2001, by which, learned Tribunal has set aside the
selection of petitioner on the post of EDBPM while
following the earlier judgment dated 22nd October, 2001
passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in Original
Applications No.50/2001 and 51/2001. The judgment
impugned reads as under:
The law on the point has been
elaborately discussed in the aforesaid
judgement and we find that the case of
the applicant is fully covered by the said judgment.
(2.) Giving benefit of the aforesaid
judgement of the applicant and taking
into consideration the admitted portion
that the marks of the applicant were
higher than respondent No.5 is the High
School, we allow this OA and direct the
respondents that after selecting the
candidate on the basis of marks obtained
in the S S L C (Matriculation) Examination,
the selected candidate may be asked to
fulfill the requirement of property/income
certificate etc. within a period of three months.
(3.) Upon perusal of the above judgment, it is
revealed that direction has been issued by the Tribunal to
the respondents that first selection shall be made on the
post of EDBPM and after selection candidate may be
asked to fulfill the requirement of property/income
certificate etc. within a period of three months, which is
not correct as per rules of the department.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.