JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) After framing of the issues on 5.5.2010 in
this election petition, the respondent submitted
this application on 11.5.2010, being IA
No.6839/2010 and prayed for summoning of the
following documents :-
(1)Marked Copy of Electoral Roll relating to
the Polling Station No.68.
(2)Marked Copy of Electoral Roll relating to
the Polling Station No.124.
(3)Marked Copy of Electoral Roll relating to
the Polling Station No.192.
(4)Register of Voters in Form No.17-A relating
to the Polling Station No.68.
(5)Register of Voters in Form No.17-A relating
to the Polling Station No.124.
(6)Register of Voters in Form No.17-A relating
to the Polling Station No.192.
(7)List of Tendered Votes in Form No.17-B
relating to the Polling Station No.68.
(8)List of Tendered Votes in Form No.17-B
relating to the Polling Station No.124.
(9)List of Tendered Votes in Form No.17-B
relating to the Polling Station No.192.
(2.) Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The respondent in the application gave details
of the documents referred above and stated only
that the above documents are pertaining to
Nathdwara Legislative Assembly Constituency No.176
regarding the election held on 4.12.2008 and shall
be required for the purpose of resolving the
controversy involved in the present election
petition and, therefore, this application may be
allowed and the above referred documents may be
summoned.
(3.) Learned counsel for the respondent submitted
that even if it is not disclosed that for what
purpose, these documents will be needed by the
respondent and even if they have not been relied
upon in the reply to the election petition and
even if they have not been entered in the list of
documents, yet in view of the judgment of the
Hon'ble Apex Court delivered in the case of
Wilfred D'souza vs. Francis Menino Jesus Ferrao
reported in 1977 SCR 942, the respondent has right
to give evidence for all the tendered votes
irrespective of the fact that the respondent has
not relied upon the documents anywhere in the
reply and has not entered the above documents in
the list of documents of the respondent. It is
submitted that the tendered votes presupposes that
there is a claim of casting vote by other than
genuine voter and the tendered vote is given to
the person after satisfying about his identity by
the competent officer as provided under the
provisions of Representation of People Act, 1951
and, therefore, all the tendered votes are
required to be counted in the election petition.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.