JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Appellant convicted by judgment dated 22.2.89 for the offence of
S. 5 (1) (d) and S.5 (2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (hereinafter
referred to as 'the PC Act'), is sentenced to one year's rigorous
imprisonment with fine Rs.200/-and for non-payment, three months'
rigorous imprisonment, hence this appeal.
(2.) Alleged incident and sequence of events, per prosecution, as
unfolded in course of trial, is that on May 13th, 1987, Chhina Ram PW 6 at
11.00 hours, presented written complaint Ex.P6 to Inspector, C.B.I. Shri
Gaur PW 5, complaining that he (PW 6) doing work of handicraft, has
often to go at various places Bombay, Delhi, Ahmedabad etc and, on that
day, he is at Pali and has to go Ahmedabad so for that reservation he at
Pali railway station reservation counter, met clerk, who first declined, but
when persuaded, told of cost Rs.50/-of which Rs.38/-for ticket and
Rs.12/-over and additional and the clerk, keeping the slip, has asked him
to come after hour or one and half PW 6 mentioned in complaint that
he does not want to pay bribe and desire that be caught red-handed. PW
5, making own endorsement on Ex.P6, instructed Sub-Inspector PW 4 to
verify the demand and PW 4 doing so, informed that for providing seat in
train No.251 UP for Ahmedabad, charges including reservation are Rs.38/
and asked are Rs.50/-. PW 5, making endorsement on Ex.P6, also
mentioned that learnt is of one Mr. Meena sitting on reservation counter
is accepting bribe from the passengers, so decided to lay the trap.
Initiating proceedings, PW 5 at dak bungalow, called two persons Shri
O.P.Mutha PW 1 officer SBBJ and Shri Rajendra Mohnot PW 2, an
Assistant at United India Insurance and in presence of these, complainant,
S.I. PW 4, constables Alam Singh and Niranjan Kumar, PW 5 taking
down the numbers of the five currency notes presented by complainant in
memo being prepared Ex.P1, the notes were smeared with
phenolphthalein powder and purpose with other details explained to all
and then giving notes to PW 6 who kept in pocket of his Kurta, PW 6
was instructed to pass these notes to reservation clerk on demand and if
the clerk accepts-apart from cost Rs.12/-more-to indicate by putting his
hand at head PW 2 was asked to accompany complainant and
specifically instructed to remain present there and witness the passing
over the amount and also to over-hear conversation memo of these
proceedings is Ex.P1, drawn from 1215 hrs. to 1315 hrs.
Complainant and raid party proceeded to railway station in two
auto-rickshaws. According to trap memo Ex.P2, on passing over of rupees
fifty as 10 x 5 from complainant to reservation clerk and seeing the signal
from complainant, PW 5 and all others rushed to reservation room and at
reservation counter challenged reservation clerk (appellant), whether he
has just accepted bribe from Chhina Ram, for providing a seat in train to
Ahmedabad and also gave introduction of members of the party the
clerk initially became nervous and then started repeating that he has to
return some amount to PW 3 which he could not return due to rush and
disclosed own name to be Juja Ram appellant when asked about fare
etc. , replied ticket charges, including Re.1/-for reservation being Rs.38/
and when asked why accepted Rs.50/-, stated that he could not return the
money due to rush. His hands were washed by coloureless sodium
carborate aqua solution which, turning pink, sealed in two bottles Arts. 6
and 7. Appellant asked about money taken from complainant, pointed for
left side drawer, meanwhile called for station superintendent Shri Ram
Kishan Sharma also reached in left hand drawer, found were above five
notes (and also 10 + 2 notes rupee one coin) which tallied with numbers
recorded in prepared Ex.P1 and in left hand drawer also found notes 10
+2 and a coin of Re.1/-. Inquiring about sale proceeds of the tickets,
appellant pointed towards ticket tube and drawer of the table which were
collected. In personal search were found Rs.10 x 2 plus 5 x 2 = Rs.30/
which tallied with entry of declaration in private cash book reservation
chart Ex.P12from the register, slip Ex.P8 and issued ticket bearing
No.22294 over which were written figures 44 and on back 251 UP/13/5
Ex.P7 Chhina Ram Meena, taken in possession. Chief Booking Clerk Shri
Shyam Lal was asked to tally the found amount with sale proceeds the
amount found was Rs.1213/-whereas sale proceeds of the duty hours of
Juja Ram were Rs.1633/-and returns Rs.360/-so amount ought to have
been 1273, whereas found was 1213 and if sale proceeds of this ticket
Rs.38/-is included, this amount becomes Rs.1251/-, whereas ought to
have possessed Rs.1273/-. Thus, was short 1273 -1251, of Rs.22/-. All
these proceedings started at 1315 hrs. and completed at 1800 hrs. and
memo drawn is Ex.P2, memos of impression of seal prepared one being
Ex.P3 and site plan is Ex.P4. Just behind seat of appellant Juja Ram, was
a tin box which disclosed to be of Yogendra Singh who called and found
in box a note of Rs.50/-and also 2 x 20 plus 10 x 1 plus 5 total Rs. 55
with reservation slips and tickets etc., taken in possession as Yogendra
could not, per prepared memo Ex.P5, satisfactorily explained of these.
PW 5, prepared detailed report Ex.P11 and on basis of it was registered
FIR Ex.P16 for the offence of S.161 IPC and S. 5 of the P.C. Act, 1947.
Inspector Shri A.R.Kaushik, PW 7, in course of further investigation,
obtaining various records, seized vide memos Ex.P17 to Ex.P20, recorded
statements of witnesses etc. and after obtaining prosecution sanction,
accorded by PW 7, charge-sheet submitted.
(3.) Appellant charged on above allegations, claimed trial.;