JUDGEMENT
GOVIND MATHUR, J. -
(1.) THIS misc. petition as per provisions of
Section 482 CrPC pertains to a criminal complaint preferred to a under
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred
to as -œthe Act of 1881 -) regarding dishonour of cheque of Rs.1,85,000
issued and signed by one Shri Ramesh Kumar in the capacity of Proprietor,
Madhur Milan Enterprises. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barmer under an
order dated 5.6..2006 took cognizance of the complaint for offence
punishable under Section 138 of the Act of 1881 and a revision petition
challenging the order aforesaid came to be rejected by learned Additional
Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Balotra vide order dated 27.6.2008.
(2.) THE contention of counsel for the petitioner is that the Courts below materially erred while not appreciating the fact that no liability
upon the present petitioner could have been fastened as he is nothing to
do either with Madhur Milan Enterprises or with Ramesh Kumar who tendered
the cheque concerned. It is emphasized that there is nothing on record on
basis of which the petitioner could have been even remotely connected
with the proceedings under Section138 of the Act of 1881.
Despite service, nobody has put in appearance to contest this petition on behalf of complainant Naresh Kumar son of Shankar Lal. This
Court by order dated 7.1.2009 while admitting this petition for hearing
called for the record, thus, the same is available for examination.
(3.) THE Chief Judicial Magistrate took cognizance against the present petitioner on the count that in the complaint it is stated that
-œaccused are partners of firm Madhur Milan Enterprises. - Learned
Additional Sessions Judge while rejecting the revision petition preferred
by the petitioner held that the issue as to who are partners of the firm
Madhur Milan Enterprises could be examined only after leading evidence
and, therefore, at this stage nothing wrong was done by the Trial Court
while taking cognizance under the order dated 5.6.2006 against the
petitioner too.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.