JUDGEMENT
N.P.Gupta, J. -
(1.) Heard learned counsel
for the parties.
By the impugned order the learned Court
below tias dismissed the petitioner's application
for taking on record the documents pro
duced by him and for summoning a case diary
of which he cannot get certified copy.
(2.) Perusal of the impugned order shows
that the whole burden of the impugned order
is that according to learned Court below the
petitioner has not explained satisfactorily the
delay, as it has been observed that the plaintiff
is an Advocate and is having services of a
Senior Advocate, and still he has not filed documents
at the relevant time.
(3.) Suffice it to say that a bare look at the
list of documents filed by the plaintiff alongwith
the plaint does show that the plaintiff did rely
on various documents which were not filed at
that time and it was expressly mentioned in
that list that those documents will be subsequently
filed. That apart the documents that
have now been filed which are in question,
also does show that many of the documents
are the documents which have come into existence
subsequently. In such circumstances,
the reason given by the learned Court below,
as a stock reason, cannot be said to be a proper
exercise of jurisdiction by the trial Court. Likewise
the documents are the certified copies of
the records of the Courts or authorities, and
even in the reply to the application under Order
13 Rule 2 the opposite party has not raised
any suspicion about their genuineness. In such
circumstances the relevancy of the documents
for decision of the suit was also one of the
material considerations for deciding the question
as to whether the document should be
taken on record or not. Then it has also been
pleaded, by the petitioner in the application
that he was seriously ailing, and therefore, also
could not file the document in time. In such
circumstances, instead of myself undertaking
the exercise, with the consent of the parties
the impugned order is set-aside the matter is
sent back to the trial Court for deciding the
matter afresh keeping in mind the above circumstances.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.