JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)PETITIONERS are aggrieved of the selection and appointment of private respondents 5 to 14 made by respondents on the grounds taken in the writ
petition.
(2.)BRIEF facts giving rise to the present petition are that respondent no. 4 in terms of advertisement notice No. 4 of 1995 dated
30 -3 -1995 invited applications from eligible candidates for selection to the posts of General Line Teachers in Education Department. The
qualification and eligibility was also given in the advertisement notice
and right was reserved by the respondents to call candidates for
interview on the basis of qualification, particulars whereof are given in
the advertisement notice. The petitioners pursuant to the advertisement
notice also applied for their selection and they were accordingly called
for interviews along with other candidates including private respondents.
Private respondents and other candidates came to be selected, but the
petitioners were not selected. Feeling aggrieved by their non -selection,
the petitioners filed the instant writ petition.
(3.)AFTER having failed to find their place in the select list, the petitioners have challenged the selection list through the medium of this
petition mainly on the ground that the selection committee has failed to
judge and assess the suitability of the petitioners and selection of
private respondents is bad in law.
Respondents have not filed reply.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.