JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)IN LPA No.169/2004, entitled, Custodian Evacuee Property vs Ghulam Nabi Dar, which is pending disposal, two CMPs No. 128/2006 and 525/2006
were filed. Through CMP No. 128/2006 the parties jointly prayed for
acceptance of out of court settlement and for adjustment of their rights
in terms thereof in the LPA as well as OWP No.480/2003 and OWP
No.454/2005. Whereas in CMP No.525/2006 one of the parties, i.e.,
Custodian Evacuee Property, Kashmir, sought to withdraw from the
settlement.
(2.)THE learned Judges of the Division Bench being equally divided in their findings have arrived at different conclusions in regard to the
acceptance of settlement vide their separate orders dated 15.9.2007,
hence the present reference in terms of Rule 36(2) of J&K High Court
Rules.
(3.)THE dispute between the parties relates to the land measuring 37 kanals 5 marlas comprising in Survey No. 1083 (7 kanals 11 marlas); Survey No. 1100 (2 kanals 18 marlas); Survey No. 1109 (3 kanals 8
marlas); total: 13 kanals 8 marlas, which is subject matter of OWP
No.480/2005. And Survey No.1084 -Min (4 kanals 14 marlas); Survey No. 1085
(4 kanals); Survey No. 1096 -Min (1 kanal); Survey No. 1082 (2 kanals 6
marlas); Survey No. 1070 (1 kanal 17 marlas); Survey No. 1073 (2 kanals
16 marlas;); Survey No. 1074 (10 marlas); 1075 (9 marlas) and Survey No.1101 (5 kanals 16 marlas); total: 23 kanals 8 marlas, which is subject
matter of OWP No.454/2005.
The Custodian Evacuee Property on 21.11.1980 issued a Notification under Section 6 of the Evacuee Property Act for declaring
the aforesaid land as an evacuee property being in the ownership of one
Qamar -ud -Din and other evacuees. The writ petitioners in OWP No.480/2003
being the tenants -at -will of the land involved in the said writ petition
decided to do the earth filling. When they were doing so, they were
stopped by the Evacuee Department. It is their case that when they made
inquires, they were able to lay their hands on the record indicating that
the land measuring 11 kanals 6 marlas out of the land comprising in the
said survey numbers stood seized by the concerned field staff of the
Evacuee Department and placed at the supurdnama of the Custodian vide
three seizure memos dated 22.1.2003 and 1.2.2003. Claiming that they were
in possession of the land in the capacity of tenants -at -will since before
the J&K Evacuee (Administration of Property) Act, 2006 came to be
enacted, the petitioners filed OWP No.480/2003 for seeking the following
reliefs:
"i. It be declared that Section 6 of the J&K Evacuee (Administration of Property) Act, Svt. 2006 is unconstitutional.
ii. It be declared that Section 3 of the Agrarian Reforms Act, 1976 in so far as it excludes the application of Section 4 and 8 to the tenants of evacuee land, is ultra vires the Constitution.
iii. That by an appropriate writ, direction or order including a writ in the nature of certiorari following Notifications/communications be quashed:
1. Notification; dated 21.11.1980
2. Communication No.CEPS/GE/2002/2766 -70 dated 17.12.2002
3. ' Communication No.CG(EP) 1020/2003/167 -Misc -K dated 23.1.2003
4. Three seizure memo dated 2.2.2003
5. Communication No.CEPE -JE/2002/3347 -50 dated 6.2.2003
6. Communication No.DFI/SG/378 dated 22.2.2003
iv. That by an appropriate writ, direction or order including a writ in the nature of prohibition respondents be restrained from interfering in the rights of possession of the petitioners in the land and in their leveling of land and from fencing.
v. Any other appropriate writ, direction or order as the court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case be also passed in favour of the petitioner arid against the respondents."
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.