JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THE grievance of the petitioners is that they are not being promoted to the post of Assistant Engineers and Executive Engineers, since it is
alleged against them that they do not possess Technical qualification.
Before adverting to this question, let some facts of the case be recorded.
(2.) BY virtue of Govt. Order No. 126 HUD -LSG of 1980 dated 25.2.1980 and G.O. No. 76 HUD/LSG of 1981 dated 2 -2 -1981, the petitioners were appointed Sectional Officers in the pay scale of Rs.450 -700.
Thereafter relaxation of qualification bar order in respect of
un -qualified sectional officers of Local Bodies/Department J&K was issued
vide Government order No. 80 HUD/LSG of 1982 dated 12 -2 -1982, treating
such persons at par with qualified persons. It is also recorded in this
order that this order was passed keeping in view the practical experience
gained by the un -qualified sectional officers like the petitioners. It is
also stated that the inter -se seniority of such promoted persons will be
at par with qualified Sectional Officers and has been acted -upon.
(3.) THEREAFTER , Government Order No. PW -972 of 1987 dated 29 -10 -1987 records against Item -4 that all Selection Scale Sectional Officers (1900 -3200 - revised) shall be designated as Junior Engineers
Grade I and all other Sectional Officers (1300 -2550 revised) shall be
re -designated as Junior Engineers Grade II. Government Order No. 1 -PW of
1993 dated 1 -1 -1993 refers to the creating of two Grades of Junior Engineers Grade II pertaining to those, who had three -years Diploma
Course and Grade II of those holding two -years Diploma Course.
The claim of the petitioners that they are entitled to Grade I and then promotion to Assistant Executive Engineers and Executive
Engineers. The claim is based on the ground that when once the
qualification relaxation is extended to them and they are placed at par
with qualified persons, they are entitled to future promotions as a
matter of course like other persons in the Department. Since there is no
opposition to this claim nor it has been decided by the State Government
despite representation by the petitioners, there is no reason why this
claim be not accepted. Even otherwise, it appears that when the
petitioners have been placed at par with qualified persons after
according relaxation in their cases, there is no reason why they should
be deprived of the benefit for future promotions. Apart from this,
learned counsel for the petitioners has placed number of Government
Orders in respect of the contention that many persons, who were similar
to the petitioners, have since been promoted to the higher rank.
Consequently, this petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to
consider the petitioners for further promotions in the Department taking
them as qualified after Government Order No. 80 -HUD/LSJ of 1982 dated
12 -2 -1982 (Annexure P -3).;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.