(1.) THIS letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the State against the judgment dated 4th September, 1998 passed by the learned Single Judge in SWP No. 706/1998 whereby the learned Single Judge has issued a direction to the appellants to consider the case of the respondent (writ petitioner) for promotion to the post of Laboratory Assistant and also to consider his prayer for retrospective benefit of promotion.
(2.) A few facts necessary for the disposal of this appeal are that the respondent was appointed as a Peon in the Education Department. Vide order dated 12th April, 1983, he was transferred to Zoology and Botany Department to assist as Laboratory Bearer. The respondent made an application to the Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, where he was working, to change his cadre from Peon to Laboratory Bearer. His claim was considered and rejected vide order dated 11th December, 1987 by the Director, School Education, Kashmir, appellant No. 2 herein. In the meantime, some promotions were made in the Department to the post of Laboratory Assistant. Aggrieved of the rejection of his claim to change his cadre, the respondent approached the court by means of SWP No. 706/89 seeking to quash the communication dated 11th December, 1987 and also issuance of writ of mandamus to adjust him against the post of Laboratory Bearer from the date of his transfer, i.e., dated 12th April, 1983. He also sought a writ of mandamus to promote him as Laboratory Assistant taking into consideration his experience.
(3.) THE learned Single Judge after hearing learned counsel for the parties, has allowed the writ petition, directing the appellants to consider the respondent for promotion to the post of Laboratory Assistant, relying on the plea of the respondent that he was working as Laboratory Bearer and falls in the common category of Laboratory Bearer/Chowkidar/Water -man/Mali etc. mentioned in the Rules contained in SRO 240 of 1979.