SAHARA FINCON PRIVATE LTD Vs. TIRUPATI CERAMICS LTD
LAWS(NCLT)-2017-9-160
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Decided on September 13,2017

SAHARA FINCON PRIVATE LTD Appellant
VERSUS
Tirupati Ceramics Ltd Respondents

JUDGEMENT

R P Nagrath, Member - (1.) Mr. Ajay Ghangas, Advocate for Applicant-Financial Creditor. Mr. Manish Jain and Ms. Divya Sharma, Advocates for the respondent. This is a petition filed by the Financial Creditor under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiating the insolvency resolution process. The application was filed in Form No.1 of the Code as prescribed in sub-section (1) of Rule 4 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016. The matter was heard on 06.09.2017. It was inter alia contended by the learned counsel for the respondent that the application is incomplete in as much as the application does not contain declaration as per Form No. 1 to the following effect:- "I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge (name of proposed insolvency professional is fully qualified and permitted to act as an insolvency professional in accordance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the associated rules and regulations) ."
(2.) It is apparent that in the application form, the name of Insolvency Resolution Professional was not proposed and so the declaration was missing. When the matter was listed on 28.07.2017, the petitioner was directed to propose the name of Insolvency Professional as required under Section 7(3) (b) of the Code, being a mandatory requirement. The compliance was made but the declaration was not filed being not originally there in the original application.
(3.) It was also contended that as per serial No.7 of Part-V of Form No.1 the petitioner is required to attach copies of entries maintained under the Bankers Book Evidence Act, 1891. The learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon its ledger account referring to various transactions through different banks but copies of the statement of account of these Banks have not been filed. These are Union Bank of India, HDFC Bank, Axis Bank, Punjab National Bank etc- This default should have in fact been pointed out by the registry before listing the case. It would be relevant to refer to sub-section (5) of Section 7 of the Code which reads as under:- "(5) Where the Adjudicating Authority is satisfied that ' (a) a default has occurred and the application under sub-section (2) is complete, and there is no disciplinary proceedings pending against the proposed resolution professional, it may. by order, admit such application; or (b) default has not occurred or the application under subsection (2) is incomplete or any disciplinary proceeding is pending against the proposed resolution professional, it may. by order reject such application: Provided that the Adjudicating Authority shall, before rejecting the application under clause (b) of sub-section (5) . give a notice to the applicant to rectify the defect in his application within seven days of receipt of such notice from the Adjudicating Authority.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.