DECCAN CHRONICLE HOLDINGS LIMITED (DCHL) AND ORS Vs. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, HYDERABAD
LAWS(NCLT)-2017-7-487
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Decided on July 10,2017

DECCAN CHRONICLE HOLDINGS LIMITED (DCHL) AND ORS Appellant
VERSUS
REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, HYDERABAD Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Ravikumar Duraisamy, Member - (1.) The National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench vide Order dated 21.10.2016 dismissed the compounding application No. 5/621A/HDB/2016, filed by the Applicants in view of the facts that the reliefs as sought by the Applicants are premature and directed the applicants to approach the Central Government for approval of the Related Party Transactions. Against the Order of this Tribunal, the Applicants have preferred an appeal to the Hon'ble National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal vide Order dated 28.02.2017 directed this Tribunal to examine the case in terms of Section 621A of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the Applicants submitted their written submissions dated 31.03.2017.
(2.) The brief facts of the case are as follows: a) That the Applicants in the instant case have filed the instant Application seeking compounding of an offence allegedly committed under Section 297 of the Companies Act, 1956. Section 297 of the Companies Act, 1956 prohibited related party transaction except with the consent of the Board of Directors and in case the Company was having a paid up share capital not less than Rs. 1 Crore, previous approval of Central Government was required. b) That the Applicants Company is a listed Company incorporated on 16.12.2002 under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956 and was duly registered with the Registrar of Companies, Hyderabad with CIN No. L22122AP2002PLC040110 and Applicant Nos. 2 and 3 are the Directors of the Applicant Company, having DIN Nos. 00287518 and 00287639 respectively. c) That in the instant case, the Applicants sought compounding of offence allegedly committed qua services obtained/payment made to one M/s. Bhaggyam Builders during the period 01.04.2005 to 31.03.2010.
(3.) The Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal while allowing the Appeal of the Applicants herein had clearly recorded that there is no question of obtaining post facto approval in terms of the provisions of Section 297 of the Companies Act, 1956 and thus this Hon'ble Tribunal may decide the instant Application in terms of Section 621A of the Companies Act, 1956.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.