PRADEEP MAHAJAN & 26 ORS Vs. PHADNIS PROPERTIES LTD
LAWS(NCLT)-2017-10-161
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Decided on October 10,2017

PRADEEP MAHAJAN And 26 ORS Appellant
VERSUS
Phadnis Properties Ltd Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) The Learned Representative of the Petitioner is present.
(2.) The Learned Representative of the IRP is present along with Mr. Kiran Kunthe in person.
(3.) On hearing both the sides and the statement of the IRP's request for substitution of IRP is "Admitted". The request of Kiran Kunthe is allowed and the consent on Form No. 2 of the substituted IRP Mr. Milind Kasodekar is on record which is reproduced as under :- nI, Milind Kasodekar, an Insolvency Professional registered with ICSI Insolvency Professional Agency having registration No. IBBI/IPA-002/IP-N00116/2017-18/10285 have been proposed as the interim professional by Mr. Pramod Kapse and others in connection with the proposed corporate insolvency resolution process of Phadnis Properties Limited and Phadnis Infrastructure Limited. " In accordance with Rule 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016, I hereby agree to accept appointment as the interim resolution professional if an order admitted the present application is passed.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.