TARA CHAND Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
LAWS(P&H)-1989-8-126
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on August 03,1989

TARA CHAND Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

S.D.BAJAJ,J - (1.) WHILE undergoing life imprisonment in District Jail, Rohtak, in pursuance of judgment dated April 21, 1982, of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonepat detenu petitioner Tara Chand was assigned the duty of convict watchman by the Jail Authorities, August 28, 1986. Convict Suresh Kumar son of Kirori Mal was under supervision in the outside gang. Aforesaid convict, however, escaped from his custody on that very day itself. Convict watchman Tara Chand was thus accused of a jail offence and punishment of reduction in rank was awarded to him for it on the following day viz., August 29, 1986.
(2.) IN Criminal Writ No. 1007 of 1989, detenu-petitioner Tara Chand has challenged the jail punishment awarded to him on the grounds that the petitioner was neither heard himself nor afforded an opportunity to cross-examine Jaipal and Dharampal, who were both examined by the Jail Authorities as witnesses against him and that the alleged inquiry against him was conducted by the officiating Superintendent Jail. In para No. 5 of the reply, it was asserted by the respondents "that the contents of para 5 of the writ petition are wrong and denied. The petitioner committed Jail offence under para 608(8) of Punjab Jail Manual and Section 45(8) of Prison Act, 1894. The contents of para 608(8) of Punjab Jail Manual and Section 45(8) of Prison Act, 1894 are reproduced below :- "Willful idleness or negligence at work by any prisoner sentenced to rigorous imprisonment." The petitioner was punished for this offence under the provisions contained in para 630(2)(c) of Punjab Jail Manual. The contents of para 630(2)(c) of Punjab Jail Manual are reproduced below :- "Forfeiture of class, grade or prison privileges for a period exceeding three months". Hence the punishment was awarded to the petitioner in accordance with the rules and provisions of Punjab Jail Manual and Prison Act, 1894."
(3.) I have heard Mrs. Veena Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri Azad Singh, Advocate for the respondents and have carefully gone through the material on record.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.