JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India challenges order dated 5.11.2007 (P-1), passed by the State
Information Commission, Punjab (for brevity, 'the Commission'),
holding that Shri Faquir Chand Sharma-respondent No. 2 is entitled
to the information sought by him. The Executive Engineer, Provincial
Division No. 1, PWD (B&R), Patiala-petitioner No. 3 has been
directed to deliver copies of his ACRs for the period from 1.4.2000 to
31.3.2006 within a period of 15 days to him.
(2.) Brief facts of the case are that on 18.7.2006, Shri Faquir
Chand Sharma-respondent No. 2, filed an application under the Right
to Information Act, 2005 (for brevity, 'the Act'), with the Public
Information Officer-petitioner No. 3 for supply of copies of Annual
Confidential Reports for the period from 1.4.2000 to 31.3.2006. The
Public Information Officer-petitioner No. 3 referred the matter to the
Appellate Authority i.e. Superintendent Executive Patiala Circle-I,
PWD (B&R) Branch, Patiala. After considering the matter, the
Appellate Authority vide order dated 8.8.2006 declined the request on
the ground that the information demanded by respondent No. 2 is
confidential and the same is exempted from disclosure under Section
8 of the Act.
(3.) Feeling aggrieved, Shri Faquir Chand Sharmarespondent
No. 2 filed an appeal before the Commission.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.