RAJENDRA KUMAR Vs. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER
LAWS(P&H)-2008-2-415
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on February 19,2008

RAJENDRA KUMAR Appellant
VERSUS
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) The petitioner was appointed as Sweeper, which is a Class- IV post, in the office of the Medical Officer (Health), Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondent-Corporation) on compassionate ground after the death of her father. He joined on the said post on July 13, 1993. The petitioner is B.Com., LL.B. As per Circular dated August 28, 2002 (Annexure P-3) issued by the Chandigarh Administration, Department of Personnel, there is a provision for filling up 15 % posts of Class-III (Clerk) by promotion from amongst Class-IV employees. The respondent-Corporation, vide letter dated February 17, 2006 (Annexure P-1) decided to fill up three vacant posts of Clerks from amongst Peons/Chokidars/Mashki/Cleaners working in the office of Medical Officer of the respondent-Corporation and invited applications for the same. The qualifications for the said posts were prescribed as Matriculation with English, five years' experience on a Class- IV post and knowledge of English Typewriting at a speed of 30 Words Per Minute. The petitioner applied for being considered for one of the said posts vide his application dated February 24, 2006 (Annexure P-2). However, his name was not considered because the posts of Class IV included in the letter (Annexure P-1) were Peons/Chokidars/Mashki/Cleaners and the post of Sweeper was not included therein.
(2.) In this petition, filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed that the respondents be directed to consider his name for promotion to the post of Clerk, he being a Class-IV employee and fulfilling all the eligibility conditions for being promoted to the said post.
(3.) In the written statement filed by the respondents, it has been pleaded that the post of Clerk is a promotional post and is being filled up by way of promotion. The petitioner, though may be eligible for appointment to the said post, but the same does not ipso facto entitle him to lay any claim on the promotional post, which can only be advanced to the persons falling in the feeder cadre. The post held by the petitioner does not fall within the feeder cadre and as such he is not entitled to be promoted to the post of Clerk. Since there are no Recruitment Rules for Class-III Ministerial Staff working in the office of Medical Officer (Health) of the respondent-Corporation, the model Recruitment Rules issued on August 28, 2002 were adopted and it was prescribed that Peon, Chokidars, Maskis and Cleaners be considered for promotion to the post of Clerk as they have no other channel of promotion while the Sweepers being a separate cadre having separate channel of promotion to the post of Sanitary Jamadar and then Head Sanitary Jamadar be not considered for separate channel of promotion. Accordingly, the advertisements were issued whereby the applications were invited from Peons, 'Chokidars', Maskis and Cleaners for promotion as Clerks. Further, it has been pleaded that the post of Sweeper cannot be equated with the post of Peon. There is difference of qualifications required for appointment to the post of Sweeper and Peon. For the post of Sweeper, no educational qualification is required whereas for the post of Peon the candidate must have passed the Middle standard examination.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.