JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The petitioner, a backward class candidate, has prayed for
quashing of the letter/order dated 4.1.2007 (Annexure P-4) issued by the
Haryana Staff Selection Commission (for short the Commission)-respondent
no.3, vide which his application for selection to the post of Mining Officer
has been rejected on the ground of his being over-age. He has further
prayed that the respondents be directed to consider him eligible for the post
in question (as he is entitled to relaxation of 5 years in age).
(2.) The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is presently
working as a Mining Inspector in Mines and Geology Department, at
Narnaul and belongs to backward class category. The Commission on
14.9.2006 vide advertisement no.7/2006 advertised one post of Assistant
Geologist (for General Category) and three posts of Mining Officer
(General=1, SC=1 and ESM=1) respectively for Mines and Geology
Department, Haryana. The petitioner is stated to have applied for the
abovesaid posts in the General Category and also deposited the fee of
Rs.500/-which is meant for General category candidates,through proper
channel on 27.9.2006. His application was recommended and forwarded to
the Commission vide letter dated 9.10.2006 (Annexure P-1) by the
respondent department, after considering him eligible with respect to age
and qualification etc. The date of birth of the petitioner is 3.3.1965. it is
stated that in the advertisement it was clearly mentioned that the candidates
between the age of 21-40 years shall be eligible. Petitioner's application for
the post of Mining Officer was rejected by the Commission vide letter dated
4.1.2007 (Annexure P-4) on the ground of his being over-age (i.e. 41 years
7 months approximately) on the cut off date i.e. 13.10/2006. Hence this writ
petition.
(3.) Vide order dated 1.2.2007, at the time of issuing notice of
motion, the following contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner
was noted:
"The petitioner had applied for the post of Assistant Geologist
and Mining Officer in pursuance to advertisement dated
14.9.2006. The application of the petitioner was rejected on the
ground that he was overage as the maximum age limit for the
post was 40 years. Counsel for the petitioner contends that as
per Rule 3.6 (b) of the Haryana Civil Services Rules which is
reproduced as under:
"(b) The age limit of 40(Forty) years shall be extended by five
years in the case of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes and
Backward Classes for appointment to Gazetted as well as non-
Gazetted services or posts..."
the petitioner was entitled to relaxation of five years as he
belongs to Backward Class.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.