JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Through the instant order, we propose to dispose of Criminal
Appeal No.610-DB of 2005 (filed by the accused/appellants Pritam Singh
and Gurjant Singh) and Criminal Revision No.1995 of 2005 (filed by the
complainant).
(2.) Criminal Appeal No.610-DB of 2005 has been filed by the
accused/appellants Pritam Singh and Gurjant Singh so as to impugn the
judgement rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar, in
Sessions Case No.71 of 2003, decided on 19.7.2005. Both the
accused/appellants Pritam Singh and Gurjant Singh were held guilty of the
charge under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and convicted
thereunder. It would be pertinent to mention, that Suba Singh, a co-accused
with the accused/appellants Pritam Singh and Gurjant Singh, was acquitted
by giving him the benefit of doubt. By a separate order passed on the same
date i.e. on 19.7.2005, both the accused/appellants Pritam Singh and
Gurjant Singh were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life under
Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, and also, to undergo imprisonment
for life under Section 449 of the Indian Penal Code, and to pay a fine of
Rs.500/-each. In default of payment of fine, the accused/appellants Pritam
Singh and Gurjant Singh were ordered to undergo further rigorous
imprisonment for three months. In addition to the aforesaid, the
accused/appellant Gurjant Singh was also sentenced to undergo rigorous
imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, under Section
25 of the Indian Arms Act, 1959. In default of payment of fine, he was
ordered to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for five months. The
trial Court also directed that all the substantive sentences awarded to the
accused/appellants Pritam Singh and Gurjant Singh would run concurrently.
(3.) The prosecution version of the incident is based on the
statement of Satnam Singh PW3, which he made to SI Azad Davinder
Singh PW9, on 7.7.2003. It would be pertinent to mention, that Satnam
Singh PW3 in his aforesaid statement asserted, that he was a resident of
village Chak Kamal Khan in Tehsil Ajnala, where he was engaged in
agriculture. He stated that his father was a member of a family comprising
of five brothers, out of them, the youngest one was Balkar Singh.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.