JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The challenge in the present
petition is to an order passed by the learned
trial Court on 17-1-2007 issuing notice of
an ad interim injunction application filed by
the petitioner to the defendant on 27-1-2007.
(2.) The petitioner has filed a suit for mandatory
injunction/permanent injunction/prohibitory
injunction restraining the defendant from
continuing with the complaint for
divorce pending in the Superior Court of New
Jersey Chancery Division-Family Part
Passaic County (hereinafter referred to as
'the Foreign Court') and from filing any other
suit case against the plaintiff in the Courts
at New Jersey (USA) or any other Court
abroad, in contravention of the provisions
of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').
(3.) It is the case of the petitioner that the
marriage between the parties was solemnized
on 27-1-2000 at Dehradun in the State
of Uttaranchal. The parties resided as
husband and wife at Panchkula. A daughter was
born out of the wedlock on 13-9-2002. The
defendant initially went abroad without permission
and without seeking consent of the
plaintiff on 15-6-2005, leaving her three year
old child with her relatives in Delhi.
On return from England, the defendant again
joined the Company of the plaintiff but
refused to apologise for her behaviour and
remained non committal about her future
plan of leaving the country without the consent of the plaintiff.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.